Next book

EXEMPLARY NOVELS

Late works from a font of so much subsequent literature; essential for students of literary history.

Cervantes’ follow-up to Don Quixote, retold for a new generation of readers.

Why exemplary? And why novels, when even the longest of these dozen stories is barely a novella, technically speaking? There are two broad reasons: the stories are compressed masterworks, containing great canvases and big ideas in just a few pages, and they all contain morals, if ones that may now seem a little fusty. Gypsies often come in for hard times. So do Jews and Muslims, but Cervantes’ great theme and rhetorical trick, no matter the ethnicity or religion of the players, is that humans are duplicitous and their ways suspect: “What is this, traitor Alí Pasha, that you, being a Muslim—which means a Turk—assault me as a Christian?” So asks an indignant Ottoman, caught up in a moment of confusion in a tableau involving a kidnapped woman on the way to being delivered to the Great Lord in Istanbul‚ though whether a virgin or not remains to be seen. Everyone pretty much tricks everyone else, spectacularly in the case of an unfortunate goof whose wife turns out to be a hooker who leaves him not just with bad vibes, but also an STD. Some of Cervantes’ stories verge on the fabulous and sometimes-surreal, as with one concerning a lawyer who imagines that he has been turned to glass, though even so, he protests, “I am not so fragile that I go along with the tide of vulgar opinion, which is most often mistaken.” The wisdom of crowds indeed. Cervantes’ stories are a pleasure, though even in Grossman's sure hands they’re a bit old-fashioned in content and tone: “The duke…sent many presents to Bologna, some so rich and sent in so timely and opportune a way, that although they could not be accepted to avoid the appearance that they were being paid, the time when they arrived facilitated everything….”

Late works from a font of so much subsequent literature; essential for students of literary history.

Pub Date: Nov. 22, 2016

ISBN: 978-0-300-12586-3

Page Count: 448

Publisher: Yale Univ.

Review Posted Online: Oct. 9, 2016

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 1, 2016

Awards & Accolades

Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • Booker Prize Winner

Next book

THE TESTAMENTS

Suspenseful, full of incident, and not obviously necessary.

Awards & Accolades

Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • Booker Prize Winner

Atwood goes back to Gilead.

The Handmaid’s Tale (1985), consistently regarded as a masterpiece of 20th-century literature, has gained new attention in recent years with the success of the Hulu series as well as fresh appreciation from readers who feel like this story has new relevance in America’s current political climate. Atwood herself has spoken about how news headlines have made her dystopian fiction seem eerily plausible, and it’s not difficult to imagine her wanting to revisit Gilead as the TV show has sped past where her narrative ended. Like the novel that preceded it, this sequel is presented as found documents—first-person accounts of life inside a misogynistic theocracy from three informants. There is Agnes Jemima, a girl who rejects the marriage her family arranges for her but still has faith in God and Gilead. There’s Daisy, who learns on her 16th birthday that her whole life has been a lie. And there's Aunt Lydia, the woman responsible for turning women into Handmaids. This approach gives readers insight into different aspects of life inside and outside Gilead, but it also leads to a book that sometimes feels overstuffed. The Handmaid’s Tale combined exquisite lyricism with a powerful sense of urgency, as if a thoughtful, perceptive woman was racing against time to give witness to her experience. That narrator hinted at more than she said; Atwood seemed to trust readers to fill in the gaps. This dynamic created an atmosphere of intimacy. However curious we might be about Gilead and the resistance operating outside that country, what we learn here is that what Atwood left unsaid in the first novel generated more horror and outrage than explicit detail can. And the more we get to know Agnes, Daisy, and Aunt Lydia, the less convincing they become. It’s hard, of course, to compete with a beloved classic, so maybe the best way to read this new book is to forget about The Handmaid’s Tale and enjoy it as an artful feminist thriller.

Suspenseful, full of incident, and not obviously necessary.

Pub Date: Sept. 10, 2019

ISBN: 978-0-385-54378-1

Page Count: 432

Publisher: Nan A. Talese

Review Posted Online: Sept. 3, 2019

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 15, 2019

Next book

THE SECRET HISTORY

The Brat Pack meets The Bacchae in this precious, way-too-long, and utterly unsuspenseful town-and-gown murder tale. A bunch of ever-so-mandarin college kids in a small Vermont school are the eager epigones of an aloof classics professor, and in their exclusivity and snobbishness and eagerness to please their teacher, they are moved to try to enact Dionysian frenzies in the woods. During the only one that actually comes off, a local farmer happens upon them—and they kill him. But the death isn't ruled a murder—and might never have been if one of the gang—a cadging sybarite named Bunny Corcoran—hadn't shown signs of cracking under the secret's weight. And so he too is dispatched. The narrator, a blank-slate Californian named Richard Pepen chronicles the coverup. But if you're thinking remorse-drama, conscience masque, or even semi-trashy who'll-break-first? page-turner, forget it: This is a straight gee-whiz, first-to-have-ever-noticed college novel—"Hampden College, as a body, was always strangely prone to hysteria. Whether from isolation, malice, or simple boredom, people there were far more credulous and excitable than educated people are generally thought to be, and this hermetic, overheated atmosphere made it a thriving black petri dish of melodrama and distortion." First-novelist Tartt goes muzzy when she has to describe human confrontations (the murder, or sex, or even the ping-ponging of fear), and is much more comfortable in transcribing aimless dorm-room paranoia or the TV shows that the malefactors anesthetize themselves with as fate ticks down. By telegraphing the murders, Tartt wants us to be continually horrified at these kids—while inviting us to semi-enjoy their manneristic fetishes and refined tastes. This ersatz-Fitzgerald mix of moralizing and mirror-looking (Jay McInerney shook and poured the shaker first) is very 80's—and in Tartt's strenuous version already seems dated, formulaic. Les Nerds du Mal—and about as deep (if not nearly as involving) as a TV movie.

Pub Date: Sept. 16, 1992

ISBN: 1400031702

Page Count: 592

Publisher: Knopf

Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: July 1, 1992

Categories:
Close Quickview