A brief but thoughtful, topical read.
A French philosopher and sociologist examines femininity as constructed by the dominant and destructive “Weinsteinian masculinity that still remains dominant.”
Liogier, who teaches philosophy in Paris, reflects on how “archaic [masculinity has] focused on the mastery of the [female] other while blinding [itself] with the fantasy of the transcendence of the [male] self.” He writes from the perspective of a white male heterosexual disgusted by the actions of other white heterosexual men like Harvey Weinstein who is also aware of the misogyny embedded in how he has been “conditioned to view and desire women.” The global #MeToo movement, he writes, was not simply an example of the mobilizing power of the internet, but a historic groundswell that signaled recognition of a “transcendental subjectivity” that transformed women from objects of male desire to subjects demanding equality before the law. Liogier then deconstructs the myth of “Prince Charming.” Based on a 14th-century folktale about a princess raped in her sleep by a king, the myth suggests that rape is not only a “blessing,” but the means by which the princess is “enabled to awaken to her true life” as a woman. Such stories are only reflections of a capitalist Western culture in which females have been denied the enjoyment of their own corporeality. Women are valuable only for the wealth, power, and/or status they bring to men. Such modern developments as the internet now allow females to not only express themselves en masse; they also permit women to undermine masculine control of their bodies as they pursue their own pleasure and self-empowerment. This new situation, writes the author, leaves heterosexual men forced to redefine their “ambitions as men, our fantasies as men, our behavior as men, our desires as men.” While Liogier’s work does not offer new insights into gender, it is still important for what it reveals about how modern gender movements have impacted the way respectful heterosexual men perceive themselves and their relationship to women.
A brief but thoughtful, topical read.Pub Date: Jan. 28, 2020
ISBN: 978-1-63542-993-0
Page Count: 112
Publisher: Other Press
Review Posted Online: Oct. 5, 2019
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 1, 2019
For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.
Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979
ISBN: 0061965588
Page Count: 772
Publisher: Harper & Row
Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular...
A neurosurgeon with a passion for literature tragically finds his perfect subject after his diagnosis of terminal lung cancer.
Writing isn’t brain surgery, but it’s rare when someone adept at the latter is also so accomplished at the former. Searching for meaning and purpose in his life, Kalanithi pursued a doctorate in literature and had felt certain that he wouldn’t enter the field of medicine, in which his father and other members of his family excelled. “But I couldn’t let go of the question,” he writes, after realizing that his goals “didn’t quite fit in an English department.” “Where did biology, morality, literature and philosophy intersect?” So he decided to set aside his doctoral dissertation and belatedly prepare for medical school, which “would allow me a chance to find answers that are not in books, to find a different sort of sublime, to forge relationships with the suffering, and to keep following the question of what makes human life meaningful, even in the face of death and decay.” The author’s empathy undoubtedly made him an exceptional doctor, and the precision of his prose—as well as the moral purpose underscoring it—suggests that he could have written a good book on any subject he chose. Part of what makes this book so essential is the fact that it was written under a death sentence following the diagnosis that upended his life, just as he was preparing to end his residency and attract offers at the top of his profession. Kalanithi learned he might have 10 years to live or perhaps five. Should he return to neurosurgery (he could and did), or should he write (he also did)? Should he and his wife have a baby? They did, eight months before he died, which was less than two years after the original diagnosis. “The fact of death is unsettling,” he understates. “Yet there is no other way to live.”
A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular clarity.Pub Date: Jan. 19, 2016
ISBN: 978-0-8129-8840-6
Page Count: 248
Publisher: Random House
Review Posted Online: Sept. 29, 2015
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 15, 2015
© Copyright 2025 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
