Next book

HOW WE WIN THE CIVIL WAR

SECURING A MULTIRACIAL DEMOCRACY AND ENDING WHITE SUPREMACY FOR GOOD

A politically charged, thoughtfully reasoned call to rally around the flag—and not the Stars and Bars, to be sure.

It’s 2022—high time, Phillips urges, to finally defeat the Confederacy.

We must choose “between democracy and whiteness,” writes Phillips, author of Brown Is the New White. The democracy of which he writes is an anti–White supremacist, multiracial, and multicultural one. The Whiteness is that of the Confederate constitution, exemplified by the declaration of the Confederacy’s vice president that “the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition.” Though there’s some stridency to Phillips’ argument, it’s not hyperbolic. The emergence of a neo-Confederate White supremacist movement, abetted by the Trump administration, and recent Republican efforts to suppress the ethnic-minority vote are of a piece with the past. Phillips characterizes this continuity as the product of a “Confederate Battle Plan” that has five major planks, including never giving an inch while insisting, say, that elections have been stolen and White people disenfranchised, as well as “rewriting the laws so that they don’t lose again.” Inimical to a true multiracial democracy, this battle plan has been refined and sharpened—and it’s in place today. Against it, Phillips proposes a “Liberation Battle Plan” with components that include the demand that Democrats stop trying to accommodate and compromise with those “who are waging an unrelenting, centuries-long war in defense of their cherished belief that America should be a white nation.” Leading this battle in its most recent skirmishes are Black activists, particularly Black women such as Georgia’s Stacey Abrams. These leaders “don’t look like the traditional white male model of intelligence and competence,” but they are obviously capable of unexpected victories, aided by smart use of hard data and clearly defined plans of attack, all in the interest of arriving at “a social contract for the society we want to live in.”

A politically charged, thoughtfully reasoned call to rally around the flag—and not the Stars and Bars, to be sure.

Pub Date: Oct. 18, 2022

ISBN: 978-1-62097-676-0

Page Count: 384

Publisher: The New Press

Review Posted Online: Aug. 9, 2022

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 1, 2022

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 14


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

ABUNDANCE

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 14


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Helping liberals get out of their own way.

Klein, a New York Times columnist, and Thompson, an Atlantic staffer, lean to the left, but they aren’t interrogating the usual suspects. Aware that many conservatives have no interest in their opinions, the authors target their own side’s “pathologies.” Why do red states greenlight the kind of renewable energy projects that often languish in blue states? Why does liberal California have the nation’s most severe homelessness and housing affordability crises? One big reason: Liberal leadership has ensnared itself in a web of well-intentioned yet often onerous “goals, standards, and rules.” This “procedural kludge,” partially shaped by lawyers who pioneered a “democracy by lawsuit” strategy in the 1960s, threatens to stymie key breakthroughs. Consider the anti-pollution laws passed after World War II. In the decades since, homeowners’ groups in liberal locales have cited such statutes in lawsuits meant to stop new affordable housing. Today, these laws “block the clean energy projects” required to tackle climate change. Nuclear energy is “inarguably safer” than the fossil fuel variety, but because Washington doesn’t always “properly weigh risk,” it almost never builds new reactors. Meanwhile, technologies that may cure disease or slash the carbon footprint of cement production benefit from government support, but too often the grant process “rewards caution and punishes outsider thinking.” The authors call this style of governing “everything-bagel liberalism,” so named because of its many government mandates. Instead, they envision “a politics of abundance” that would remake travel, work, and health. This won’t happen without “changing the processes that make building and inventing so hard.” It’s time, then, to scrutinize everything from municipal zoning regulations to the paperwork requirements for scientists getting federal funding. The authors’ debut as a duo is very smart and eminently useful.

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Pub Date: March 18, 2025

ISBN: 9781668023488

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Avid Reader Press

Review Posted Online: Jan. 16, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2025

Next book

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Close Quickview